Dos and Don’ts of Dating
There are no hard and fast rules to dating, but here are some tips that won't do any harm.
Do let go of the past. It's done. Build yourself a small bridge and get over it. Quit telling your story; it's boring.
Don't jump straight into another relationship. Take some time to adjust; you need to be alone for a while to rediscover who you are.
Do find a balance. Seek love, but don't make it your whole life. Get a hobby. Knit, volunteer. Knit yourself a volunteer.
Do cultivate relationships with other single people; it's depressing being the token singleton in a crowd of couples; like being alone on Noah's Ark.
Don't drink in excess on dates. It's pathetic and leads to arm-gnawing moments of awkwardness later.
Don't come on too strong. It's unnerving, and you're dating, not stalking. Keep the mystery and let things progress naturally.
Don't introduce the person you're seeing to your friends and family too early; it's tempting when you're used to being part of a couple, but is overwhelming.
Do be open; rigid rules about a 'type' may mean you dismiss somebody lovely.
Do maintain your self-respect; go easy with sharing information. There's plenty of time to get to know each other; no early soul-baring. It smacks of desperation.
Don't take it all so seriously. Approach it with a sense of openness and fun. Flirt a bit, enjoy it all, and you'll be infinitely more attractive!
Online Dating Links for 11-11
Craigslist charging for erotic services. We’ll see how using a fake credit card to authenticate pimps works out.
“Single?” Lawn Signs Conquer the American Landscape.
Adaptive Websites: MIT Technology Review has a great article about Adapting Websites to Users, a good read if you are interested in creating a closer connection to/between your viewers/readers/members/customers. Typical dating sites don’t do anything special with what they know about you. Maybe you see photos of the gender you’re interested in, or some basic geo-targeted ads (Hot girls want to meet you in [insert your town name]!) which is a total fallacy. Adult Friend Finder and Fling do this all the time. I do have to say that the amount of customized affiliate ads AFF offers is staggering.
Lesbians on Bonefish, via Online Personals Watch. Speaking of lesbians, IMVU has launched some pretty racy banner ads.
Zoosk redesigned their site. I’ve been comparing the people on Zoosk and Are You Interested, and the AYI people are much better looking and responsive to emails, at least in my experience.
Skadate has 5 Tips how to get relevant ads and make money on your web site.
Perfectmatch is up 47% over the last quarter.
Recently released statistics from Perfectmatch.com show a spike in new members of 47% over the last quarter, accelerating a trend that started at the beginning of 2008. In addition, matches are up 125%, as members are renewing their subscriptions and finding more perfect matches than ever before. Among the members, a staggering 92% are using the Duet Compatibility System (Duet), the site’s research-based matching and capability program, to access personality types different from their own.
Online Dating News has launched a site for Online Dating Commercials and spoof videos. Not sure why they didn’t just add it as a feature to their site. They also launched a site called Onlinedatingbookmarks, which has exactly 5, all affiliate links to top 10 sites. Someone tell me why this is useful.
Janis Spindel, famed Matchmaker, is now getting paid in Rolls Royces. Matchmakers are great for the few people that can afford them, but what is their success rate?
The latest Jupiter Report has given Mark Brooks a nice bit of promotion. Mark is quite good at getting his name out there, laying out a few soundbites and dropping client names. It’s a great skill to have. Do dating sites actually purchase these generic reports? Is there anything in them you can’t read here?
Facebook Marketing Bible, November 2008 edition.
Lots of stories about location-based dating lately. I’ve been talking to several companies getting involved in the space. If you don’t have a ton of money, an absolutely top-notch design and programming team and a killer conduit to millions of users, you’re going to fail. The problem with all of these services is that nobody is using them yet. They have to be part of a larger site like PoF, Match or Facebook to be truly useful, although Loopt got a great spike when they were features on an Apple tv ad. Check me out on Brightkite, thats the only place I periodically update my location with notes and photos.
© 2008 - visit author to view original post.
Yahoo On Track To Be World’s Largest Dating Site
Yahoo is by far the largest dating site. PlentyOfFish, Match and SinglesNet combined don’t even come close to the number of singles on Yahoo. Let’s look at a few reasons why why Yahoo isn’t owning the market.
To compound how far Yahoo has fallen, remember that it has launched and shuttered several attempts at social networks. Now Yahoo is building out a new “social” platform and recently Yahoo rolled out new profiles, replacing ancient attempts at letting people describe themselves with a few links and some text. Tech Crunch says to go get our Shiny New Yahoo Profiles and was there when Yahoo Previewed Its New Application Platform.
Yahoo begins the rollout of its new user profile today, which marks the first tangible product release for the social part of the Yahoo Open Strategy, or YOS. The profile is one of the anchors (mail is the other) to Yahoo’s strategy of turning the site into one big social network.
Turns out they deleted everyone’s profile information, which upset people to no end. Not that there was much to delete, but still, unexpected. Update: turns out you can request your old profile data at Customer Care. This is a good example of what’s wrong with Yahoo. Who in the world approved the process of removing all data from profiles? I understand that with hundreds of millions of profiles, making changes is never easy, but it seems like Yahoo made a lot of mistakes that I wouldn’t have expected.
Yahoo is a champion at squandering opportunities and their stock price shows it. Morale is down, more layoffs are probably coming and the executive directory might as well be written on a whiteboard it changes so often. And that’s just Yahoo Personals.
Here’s my new profile, empty, oops!
The Managing your alias and profile post explaining the changes has 1,100 comments. Here’s the explanation of what happens when you start sharing data with third-party applications. And you though Facebook app data sharing was difficult to explain? I wonder how many comments the post explaining data sharing is going to have.
What Can Yahoo Do to Improve Dating?
Yahoo spent an enormous amount of time and energy upgrading their dating site platform. I spoke with Yahoo a year ago, about the upgrade, back when Susan Mernit was still around. Doesn’t seem like anything has changed in ages. Why go through the process of a massive infrastructure upgrade and do so little with it? At least they can start to achieve feature parity with the competition.
Yahoo has the largest number of profiles of any website. At the core, they should add a checkbox to your profile that let’s people self-identify as being single. Bingo, add tens of millions of singles to their database. If they make dating more social, which they should, they could tie lifestream data, Flickr photos, MyBlogLog communities and lots of data from other Yahoo properties. That’s where things start to get interesting.
I certainly hope someone at Yahoo Personals has the foresight, power and organizational skills to make this happen. It’s a great brand, the site looks great and works well, for the most part, but the lack of keeping up has me worried about it’s viability in the long term. Yahoo Personals started with a hell of a lot more going for it than any other dating site, but will it ever really flourish?
Otherwise we get to think about what it will be like if Microsoft runs Yahoo Personals (and how weird that would be because MS has a huge deal with Match.)
© 2008 - visit author to view original post.
Become a Pro at the Art of Flirting with the Opposite Sex
You finally get them to nitice you and they walk over to talk to you. Now what? How do you keep them interested? That is where the art of flirting comes in. It's really quite simple.
It’s Saturday night in a crowded bar. A man and woman are locked in conversation. She’s laughing, batting her eyelashes and playing with her hair. He’s standing with his head tilted slightly, leaning in toward her and occasionally touching her arm. They’re performing a social ritual that’s been around for more than 5,000 years — flirting.
Flirting is one of the great joys in life. It’s an ego booster that makes you feel more attractive and desirable. Flirt with someone and they feel excited, flattered, appreciated and darn good about themselves. So indulge yourself whenever possible.
Two things are going on when you flirt. The first is the actual conversation, and the second is your body language. Flirting is an enticement and an invitation that lets the other person catch glimpses of your most attractive characteristics and behaviors.
These days, it’s a lost art, but it’s great fun when done well. Practice flirting with acquaintances or friends of the opposite sex (without telling them) and see what techniques get the best response.
For those who feel clueless about where to even start, we assure you that flirting is a learned behavior. It’s not only possible to pick up the basics, but with a little practice, you can perfect the art. Let’s start with the flirting conversation.
It’s Just Lunch Offers a Snapshot: Do Politics and Dating Make a Match?
The following are results from the It's Just Lunch poll.
1. How important is your date's political affiliation?
Overall Male Response Female Response
Somewhat Important 40% 34% 44%
Somewhat Unimportant 23% 25% 22%
Not Important 27% 34% 22%
Very Important 10% 7% 12%
2. Would you date someone who supports an opposing political party?
Yes 63% 70% 58%
Maybe 29% 24% 33%
No 8% 6% 9%
3. If your date asked about the upcoming election, would you be
comfortable responding?
Yes 87% 91% 85%
No 13% 9% 15%
4. At what time do you believe it's appropriate to discuss politics
on a date?
On the third date 40% 38% 40%
On the first date 33% 37% 32%
On the fifth date 17% 15% 19%
Only when in a
committed relationship 10% 10% 9%
5. How important is it to you that your date be knowledgeable of the
issues concerning the upcoming election?
Somewhat Important 57% 55% 58%
Very Important 17% 11% 20%
Not Important 11% 15% 9%
Somewhat Unimportant 15% 19% 13%
6. If you had plans for a date and found the only time you would be able
to vote would be when you are scheduled to meet, would you cancel your
date in order to vote?
Yes 14% 13% 15%
No 13% 21% 8%
I would see if we could
meet later if I was able
to finish voting in a
reasonable amount of time 73% 66% 77%
7. How would you feel if your date cancelled or rescheduled a date with
you so that he/she could vote?
I would understand and
respect the individual
for exercising this right 67% 69% 67%
I would be completely
annoyed and would have
no further interest in
dating this person 4% 3% 3%
I would be disappointed
and hope we could
reschedule 29% 28% 30%
8. You meet your date, there is a definite physical attraction and
chemistry BUT you learn your date supports a different party. Would
that deter you from going on a second?
Yes 11% 11% 11%
No 89% 89% 89%
Match Mobile Alerts
Received an email from Match about free text alerts. I also figured out how to browse profiles linked from text alerts when someone sends a wink or email. There is an option to view the regular site on my iPhone, instead of the mobile version, which costs $4.95/month to access.
Incestuous Search With Spark’s Facelink
Spark Networks has launched Facelink, a meta-search engine which returns online dating profile results from across all Spark properties.
Facelink reminds me of when I went to Lycos a few years ago to discuss their meta-search engine. I told Lycos that their site was destined to fail (it did) and I’m not straying too far from that message after trying out the current version of Facelink.
Network-based meta-search engines don’t work unless significant marketing dollars are redirected to the search engine from other destinations. The service should also work.
Instead, with Facelink, we are left scratching our heads. The user experience is all over the place, every search result is different, some profiles have photos, some don’t, some photos are hidden, some profiles are inactive, very confusing. Some say I need to create an account to view photos (again), yet the next search result doesn’t show that same massage.
Spark runs “over thirty online dating networks”, then why are there only 20 sites (they are not really networks”) included in the search results?
Search is free, you still have to pay to join the site(s) members belong to that you want to contact. Where is the one-pass where you can belong to all sites for 30 days? They should consider rolling that out as a billing feature.
In what particular circumstances would someone want to see search results across religious sites like JDate and Christian Mingle?
Why can’t I filter results by site? Why aren’t the sites a profile is associated with listed in the search results?
Why does the site look and function like it was built in an afternoon?
What is the concept behind “parametric search” and how is it different from regular dating site search?
It’s not revolutionary by any sense of the term, but I do like the free text, once you get the hang of it, wonder how it stacks up against MatchWords in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. I know, let’s have a shootout (not!)
I searched for women ages 31-25 who use the word “biking” in their profile. Of millions of profiles, only 864 mention the word. That can’t be right, can it?
There are 25 women in Boston who use the word restaurant in their profile? Something is seriously wrong with the search algorithm.
Search results are spotty, the lack of simple geographic filtering is a big problem. Women who mention biking in New Jersey show up before women in the Boston area.
Search results don’t display photos! That’s no good, this isn’t Google, show me some faces, and in gallery view, please. When I click through to profiles, most from JDate. To make matters worse, on some profiles I can read the text of the profile but “Only members can see my photos”.
I click on “Email Me” and am sent to registration page that doesn’t explain that I have to register and pay to become a member, before I can even see her photos. Hello user interface person, did they let you into any meetings?
I click on one more text result and am greeted with a mini-version of the profile of a woman with a great smile. I can see her photo, but then we have the signup page below her profile and the alert “You have exceeded the visitor search limit. Please login or register now to continue searching.”
Talk about a site that needs big Beta tag on the home page. Spark Networks spent a lot of money standardizing on a platform to power all 30+ sites, but the system templates and business logic isn’t future-proofed enough to adapt to a meta-search engine.
There are two types of people who will visit Facelink, those that already belong to a Spark Networks property, and those that don’t. Spark spent zero time differentiating the user experience ad marketing copy for each constituency. Actually, there is no marketing copy explaining what is going on. Click and pray.
Why doesn’t spark give you the option to create an account on Facelink?
Why did they bother to create a separate standalone site? How are they going to promote it?
My grade: C-, Facelink needs a lot of work to be even remotely interesting and useful.
Here’s the Facelink press release.
MySpace Launches “My Ads” Self Serve Ad Platform
In my previous post I continued to admonish the dating industry for the continued poor state of targeted advertising. Besides social networks, no other websites gather such a broad swath of personal information. Social networks have leapt far ahead of dating sites when it comes to advertising and dating sites continue to leave money on the table when it comes to targeted offers.
People ignore online advertising because for years, ads have not been relevant enough to the viewer’s situation. Make ads more relevant and more people will click them. It’s that simple.
People have become so accustomed to Google ads, which parse the content of a page, grok the concept and pop up ads based on a few keywords (massive oversimplification here). But AFAIK these ads are only relevant to the content of the web page being viewed. When is the last time you saw a dating site ads related to your tastes and preferences? Maybe I don’t spend enough time on niche sites.
In the market dating consumers are faced with a daily deluge of True, Match and SinglesNet ads on social networks. These ads are so bad, bordering on offensive, that people have maligned the ads on hundreds of blogs and newspapers. Clearly a case of quantity over quality visitors, which is too bad, because it comes back to bite dating sites over time, as we have seen with True.com. Ok, True deserved it.
So here we have social networks, pulling in $200+ million based on display ads. How much do you think Match makes on their underwear and education display ads?
I’m tired of complaining about dating site ads, lets talk about the companies that really get it, Facebook and MySpace. Perhaps this will act as some inspiration to the dating industry, or not. MySpace has launched a new ad platform, and it looks amazing.
MySpace Launches “My Ads” Self Serve Ad Platform:
Facebook allows targeting as well, although it’s based on interest areas put in by users directly. So if someone says they like books, you can target ads to them based on that. What MySpace does is much different - they build out a profile of each user based on what they do on MySpace over time, with 1,200 different ways to categorize each user. So if you only want to target women who live in California between the ages of 25-30 who like motorcycles, i can. There are 2,842 of them on MySpace.
That level of targeting is incredible. MySpace can increase revenue, offer better targeting than Facebook, and just maybe break the billion dollar mark. There are lots of detractors saying MyAds isn’t going to work, but at this point, anything that increases ad relevance is a good thing, whether MySpace makes a billion doing it or not. This type of targeting will filter down, like race car technology showing up in consumer cars after a few years. Maybe it will even make it onto dating sites.
Dating sites, Stop Nickel and Diming Members
I’m glad I got my dating rant off my chest, back to business. Apple is announcing new laptops in 15 minutes. I am bouncing around the office in anticipation.
Match is inserting ads into it’s free SMS alerts. The ads are terrible. “Earn a degree”, “Info on the best schools”, why is this un-targeted junk reaching me? It’s bad enough they are charging for mobile access. Next post will be about the new Myspace self serve targeted ad platform. Maybe that will get dating sites starting to think about mining everything they know about members instead of the blunders we see on Match and PlentyOfFish. Un-targeted ads on dating sites are a red flag for greed and frankly exhibit a lack of taste that bothers me to no end. I guess most singles don’t care about the ads, as long as they are meeting people. But who actually clicks on this junk?
My friend Kara wrote in to say that Engage is now charging for general features such as seeing who has expressed interest in you, contacting people and finding out who thinks you’re a match. I don’t understand why some profiles require me to pay $5.95 just to view, while others I can view for free. Interesting that monthly visits continue to increase, from 1.5 million to almost 4 million over the past year. We’ll see how the new paywall influences visits and engagement over the next few months.
Online Dating Takes Too Long
This post is from me as a single guy about to turn 40 next week. Forget the industry insider, forget the consulting, forget the years of experience with online dating, it’s time to get my rant on.
I just spent the last two hours on Match.com. Updating my profile, changing photos, emailing people, returning winks and cleaning out my inbox and Favorites. This is what happens when you bookmark too many people, much better to email immediately, or forget about them. Pretty soon you are drowning in possibilities, and start to delete people because their pictures are too dark, or not revealing enough, or you hate that they dressed their lapdog Mr. Bumbles up like a pumpkin.
It’s absolutely true, there are something like 10% of men on dating sites and we do ALL the work. Women hardly ever email men, and dating sites are doing NOTHING to change that. Why is that? Forget human nature, let’s even up the workload here.
Winks should basically be outlawed on sites like Match. If a man winks at a women, she NEVER writes back. Take the time to send an email or get outta my inbox is the common thinking. But if a woman winks at a guy on Match, it’s all hands on deck, get out the dictionary, get witty and prepare a compliment, we have a live on on the line!
On OKCupid, winks seem to be bi-directionally accepted, interesting how it’s different on every site. OkCupid people are much more my speed, but also weirder, it’s a tradeoff.
I tried talking to a few women on PlentyOfFish, that didn’t last long. It was like talking to the wall. I am not going to perform any character assassinations but wow, talk about many millions of women I have absolutely zero in common with. It’s 2008, at least let us choose a better layout and colors.
Online dating is like using a search engine. We all just want a Google. How many search engines do you use?
I didn’t go to any more dating sites. Where am I gonna go, Yahoo!? As much as I love Y! Personals, most of the women are on Match, so why bother?
Niche sites? There isn’t a niche for me. Gays, blacks, asians and jews have it made. Me, I got nothing.
I have another 25 women to email on Match, and it’s supposed to be my day off. I need an intern or a form letter. But I can’t do that. Every email I send is painstakingly crafted in response to what the woman has written in their profile. Jesus, it’s exhausting.
God forbid she is stunning, because then you need to work overtime at catching her eye with your prose. She’s received 10 emails before yours, from men much better looking, richer and actually own property (or desperately want kids, like next week). The outlook gets pretty grim, but you give it a shot, because you never know, maybe she likes quirky renters and just doesn’t know it.
I went on two dates this weekend from OKCupid. Nice women but no chemistry. I cannot wait until people can put up videos of themselves, trying to judge someone’s personality from what they write is a pain in the ass. Anyone who writes “I’m just as comfortable in jeans..” gets deleted. If that’s all you can come up with, you have no chance with me.
Same goes if you mention trust, compassion or any one of the trigger words that mean “the last guy I dated was a jerk, you better not be.”
Yeah yeah, I know, that’s why eHarmony and compatibility testing is so good. But for me, it’s all about energy and charisma, which I find difficult to judge from most profiles.
There should be a profile field where you can tell your favorite jokes. I think that says a lot more about people than most dating sites scientifically-driven testing systems.
Matching chemistry and long-term compatibility is incredibly difficult. It’s painfully obvious that a lot of people who work in the dating industry are married. They are totally out of the loop and forget what it’s like to be single. time for some fresh, single perspectives.
Over the weekend I played Wii tennis at a house party, went to trivia night, went for a run, had two dates and saw David Sedaris at Symphony Hall. My life is full and invigorating when I step away from the keyboard. Yesterday’s date actually said I was overqualified for online dating, sigh. And yet, here I am. Maybe I’ll buy a billboard like that guy did in Australia, there has got to be an easier way.
I love it right here in Boston and don’t feel the need to go on and on about how important traveling is. We’re all going to be just as miserable after a week in Sardinia, what’s with all the “I love to travel more than anything” statements. Go look at a woman’s profile on Match and find me one that doesn’t mention traveling. Told you, practically impossible. Someone who understands this stuff, feel free to chime in.
It’s depressing to read a great profile and see a pretty face, only to find out they are friends of those Wasilla Mavericks.
I take everyone for coffee now. No more first date $100 dinners. I want dating sites to take out more of the guesswork, but they just can’t be trusted, yet.
Scenario: You call someone up, talk to them for a bit, then realizing it not working? What is the protocol for hanging up and not taking things to the next level? Calling E-Cyrano!
Sometimes I think we rely to heaving on online dating. I need to get back to basics. I live down the street from the oldest bar in America. I am going there tonight and I’m going to walk up to women I don’t know and initiate conversations and I’m not coming home until I get a phone number. It’s going to be a long night.



